I
last reported (see the previous blog entry) that Russia has economic and
political motives that are driving its actions in Syria. I also envisioned that
Russia’s motives would be best served by the total destabilization of the region
with Russia then eliminating American influence in the region. This would ultimately result in Russia being
the only super power with influence in the Middle East.
Since
my last report there have been statements made by various people, including the
President of the United States, that Russia cannot win any territory by merely
bombing. The talking heads have stated that you must have a ground force to follow
through after bombings to take and maintain control of territory. And the pundits say: since the
Russians are not putting boots on the ground, they cannot win the battle and
they will be eternally bogged down in Syria.
Why
then has the United States been bombing in Syria for a year now? We have not
put any boots on the ground. Based on
the pundits’ logic, we too are doomed to an eternal bog in Syria.
The
pundits are correct. We are doomed to remain bogged down in Syria. Not only do we not have boots on the ground,
we also do not have any partners of strength with boots on the ground. Our game
plan was to train Syrian rebels that would have been our boots on the ground.
Thus far, this strategy has not worked very well. And, there is no hope in
sight anytime soon.
Funny
how the talking heads inaccurately depict the Russians as making a mistake –
the talking heads have not yet identified that America has been making the same
mistake for over a year.
The
Russians are not as naive as we are.
They are not foolish enough to waste bombs without following up with ground
forces. They are following the United States' strategy (bomb and have others do
the grunt work on the ground). The
difference between Russia’s plan and the American plan is that the Russians
actually have boots on the ground with strength. The Syrian government’s army
is able to follow through after Russia’s bombings to take and control territory.
For good measure, the Syrian government is being assisted by Iranian soldiers
and militia men from Hezbollah.
A
good case can be made that the Syrian army along with an estimated 2,000
Iranian soldiers and an unknown number of Hezbollah militia men is a stronger
ground force than the five American trained local rebels that have taken up
arms against Syrian President al-Assad. Furthermore, the way things work in the
Middle East, success and power projects to growth. Therefore, small successes
by the Russians and the Syrian army will result in a growth of the Syrian
army. Thus, the ability to build on
success and take more and more territory.
The
Russians can win at this game and it is time that someone start taking the
situation seriously and inoculate the remainder of the region from Russian
influence before it is too late. Again, I refer to the blog entry just prior to
this one for a suggested strategy that America should follow. The strategy will
stabilize a region that has the potential to unravel out of control and
potentially spawn World War III. If
followed, the strategy would also reposition America as the world’s true super
power and expose Russia as a super bully, not the super power it pretends to
be.
No comments:
Post a Comment