Last night on
Fox news, Megan Kelly claimed to have an IRS bulletin dated from July-2010 that
estimated between forty and seventy-percent of individual plans would be
cancelled when Obamacare is implemented.
This was estimated to mean that somewhere between ten and sixteen
million people will have their insurance cancelled before the end of the year. These are only the people that purchase
health insurance for them selves.
A few nights
ago, Kirston Powers of Fox news reported that her health insurance plan (in New York
State ) had been
cancelled. She went onto the Obamacare
website and found a replacement. She
stated that her monthly premium changed from $150 to $290. Ms. Powers further stated that she is happy
to pay more for her health care if that meant that some other Americans would
be provided with health insurance at rates that they can afford. I applaud Ms. Powers for her generosity. But, she did not decide on her own to make a
contribution to the community clinic.
The new law is taking that extra one-hundred and forty bucks a month
from her whether she is happy or not.
Furthermore, is it just me, or has nobody else heard of the good stories
about somebody having their premiums reduced on the Obamacare exchange? Yes, I have heard that some people that could
not get insurance before, due to pre-existing conditions, have finally been
able to obtain health insurance. That is
good. However, I am thinking that that
is where Ms. Powers’ one-hundred-forty dollars per month are going – to cover
the costs of the high-risk-new-enrollees.
When I think
about that from an actuarial viewpoint, I think that everybody (on average) is
going to have to pay more for the high-risk-new-enrollees. Is there any other extrapolation that can be
made?
Are things better for employees who get their
health insurance from their employers?
Not that I have heard. There have
also been stories of companies informing their employees of large increases to
their paycheck deductions for health insurance due to the new Obamacare
requirements. Very large companies that
are self-insured do not have to abide by the Obamacare rules, so their
employees will not (presumably) see large increases in their paycheck deductions. At least I do not think so. But, I do not know. Do you?
We are rolling
out the largest government program in generations (maybe the largest ever) and
I do not know where to look for the answers regarding its impact on the
economy. Is healthcare going to cost
every worker more – while more Americans get free health care? Where is all the tax money coming from for
the health care tax credits being given to anyone earning less than 400% of the
poverty level? Will the smaller paychecks
result in an economic slowdown? And, at
this point in our non-recovery, recovery; will this added slowdown be enough to
push us into another recession?
I watched the
White House daily press briefing yesterday and heard The President's Press Secretary, Mr. Carney, admit that, yes,
some people (contrary to the President’s promises) will not be able to keep the
health plans that they were happy with.
However, Mr. Carney pointed out that the plans involved were inferior
and that, in the long run, the people that lose those plans will be better
off. Really? Who makes that choice for the individual –
the President, our government, the insurance companies? Whoever the decision maker is; are they
considering what the individual can afford? Or; what each individual wants to
purchase? Maybe when we are nearing
sixty years of age, we do not want maternity benefits or free contraceptives.
By the way,
those poor employees at the self-insured companies will be stuck with what the
President’s spokesman, Mr. Carney, has stated to be inferior health insurance
plans. But, they will not have to pay
more for them. Nor will hey help
shoulder the cost of the high-risk-new-enrollees. You see; the really big corporations (that
are self-insured) and their employees are exempt from Obamacare. Therefore, the individual purchasers and the
small to mid-sized businesses of America are shouldering the load.
I am very
confused by the slow drip of anecdotal information. Please somebody provide a macroeconomic
impact statement of what this new law is going to do to us. When I extrapolate the anecdotal information on
my own, I do not see a happy ending. Am
I wrong? I hope so, but nobody is
talking. Is this not the eight-hundred
pound elephant in the room?