Saturday, December 12, 2015

Candidate Debate Conduct – Take the Microphone away from Donald Trump

Tuesday night is set for another Republican Presidential Debate on CNN. Hopefully, CNN will not repeat its cage match style debate format that it employed during the first debate it hosted. Fortunately, Wolf Blitzer and not Jake Tapper will be the main moderator. Wolf is too smart to repeat the debacle of the first CNN debate. However, due to the outrageous statements that have been made by Donald Trump, questions will need to be posed regarding the positions that he has stated.
The questions should be posed to Mr. Trump directly and not indirectly through his opposing candidates. Any “Trump” question that are asked directly to another candidate should be responded with a: “Mr. Trump’s has a right to his own position. My position is …” As much as possible, every candidate should avoid any statement that gives Donald Trump extra time to respond because he may have been attacked in another candidate’s response.
And, if the moderator gives Mr. Trump extra time merely because someone states; “Mr. Trump has a right to his own position,” the candidates should object on the basis that their response did not take issue with anything Mr. Trump has stated but rather just made a declarative statement regarding their own position on the issue.
This is a strategy to allow thoughtful people discuss the issues we are facing while minimizing the carnival barking as much as possible.
It is time to take the microphone away from Donald Trump!
Donald Trump will never become President of the United States nor will he become the Republican Party’s nominee. American is already too great to have someone as crude as Donald Trump represent it in any way. He will not run as an independent either. He is too much of a “winner” to knowingly take on a position that even he knows will have no chance of doing anything other than hurt the nation by further dividing it. Donald Trump, your best move would be to drop out of the race right now while you are still on top. That way you can forever tell people that you could have been the POTUS but did not want it. The only other alternative is that you flame out and live the rest of your life as a “loser.” It is only Mr. Trump’s repeated invocation of his being a winner and his demeaning of lesser polling candidates that will make him a loser. Other candidates that have conducted themselves with common decency towards their fellow candidates can withdraw at any time with dignity.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

What I Want in My Next President

Principle. That is it, plain old principle.
The type of principle that lays out the objectives, some practical policies that could achieve the stated objectives and the expressed willingness to debate matters with both sides of the aisle in order to pass laws aimed at achieving the objectives.
Here are sample objectives: control immigration into America, repatriating the trillions of dollars American corporations have overseas, eradicating ISIS, identifying terrorists before they strike us here at home, creating more middle class jobs, assuring equal opportunities to all Americans, improving our healthcare system, assuring a habitable environment, assuring that justice is truly blind.
Other example objectives that are not as high on my priority are: eliminating income inequality, reducing greenhouse gasses, affirmative action, political correctness. These are low on my priority because they are sub-objectives of some of the objectives laid out in the paragraph above.
I want a candidate to say that my objective is to get American corporations to bring back the trillions of dollars they currently have stashed overseas because they do not want to pay taxes on that money. My plan to do this, and to prevent large American corporations from relocating their corporate headquarters overseas, is to change our tax policy to be more in-line with the rest of the developed world. Why would companies bring their money back here if we tax them more than any other country in the world? To make up for the lost revenue resulting from the lower tax rate, I propose that the following corporate tax exemptions be eliminated (enter appropriate items here). I do not expect that the elimination of these exemptions will fully offset the lost revenue from reduced tax rates. However, the status quo will result in no tax revenue as the money will stay overseas. Furthermore, these trillions of dollars when brought back to America can be used by corporations to distribute as dividends to its shareholders and/or to invest in research and development and/or infrastructure investments that the company needs to further grow its business. I plan to layout the outline of my plan for discussions with the leaders of both parties so that we can together build upon my ideas and most likely come up with a better plan. But, the underlying principle is to repatriate the money to America so it can be used to help stimulate our economy.
I would also like to hear a candidate say that my objective is to control immigration into America. This means controlling our borders once and for all, establishing controls on those who enter our nation on valid visas but never leave, and it means vetting all immigrants and visitors before they reach our soil. This will require an expenditure of $X billion and I propose that we pay for this by charging visa fees, immigration fees, and other methods (hopefully, the candidate has more ideas than I do). We will not build a wall across the Mexican border but we will construct a double fence with sensors to detect possible invaders and sufficient border patrol personnel to be able to intercept these invaders. I plan to layout the outline of my plan for discussions with the leaders of both parties so that we can together build upon my ideas and most likely come up with a better plan. But, the underlying principle is to keep America safe by stopping the flow of illegal immigration, and assuring that those we allow to enter America do not intend to harm us.
I really want to hear: I am going to eradicate ISIS and any other terrorists group that controls territory and/or assets that can be used to plan, direct or conduct strikes against American interests’ particular strikes against the homeland and our citizens.  I plan to do this with special operations forces and our Arab and NATO partners. We and our NATO partners will provide several thousand special operation forces and air support for the mission. Our Arab allies will provide infantry ground forces to establish control of the territory seized. ISIS is reported to have upwards of 40,000 soldiers and they control several hundred square miles of territory. That means that those 40,000 soldiers are spread out over a large swath of land including several towns. We will attack one town at a time and do it slowly. By progressing slowly, we will allow ISIS reinforcements from other towns to attempt to join the fight. And when they travel across open roads to get to where we are fighting, we will hit them with air strikes. We will conduct this operation one town at a time and when we move on from one town to the next, we will leave our Arab allies to establish a temporary military led government until the local country can govern themselves. Any assets we seize from ISIS during this operation such as oil fields will be used to generate revenue to pay for a portion of our continuing eradication of ISIS. I will have our generals work with our allies to develop such plans and I will hold discussions with the leaders of both parties so that we can together build upon my ideas and most likely come up with a better plan. But, the underlying principle is to eradicate ISIS.
The above three examples are what I want to see in our political discourse. Principles of what we should achieve. Discussions of both the principles and policies to achieve these principles and a stated willingness to compromise. I can accept some red lines on the objectives, but I cannot accept a politician that will not compromise on the how-to-get-there details.
I do not want pages and pages of policy wonk. I want some good ideas to gauge the candidates understanding of the issues but I do not want a fully developed pan on a specific objective. I want political discourse from both sides of America to participate so that everybody can buy-in to the plan.
This is the America I remember when I was a much younger man. It is the America I want back.

Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Donald Trump is Mr. Scrooge

But little Timmy will never touch his heart. I opined a few months ago that Donald Trump had disqualified himself when he criticized Carli Fiorina’s looks. I believed that personal attack was an insult too far. Now it seems that most Americans believe that the “bar all Muslims” is an insult too far. Welcome to my world view. Glad you could come along. Unfortunately, the die-hard Trump backers will not be deterred. In fact, many of them will be more fanatical in their support for Mr. Trump than ever. This is a shame. It paints a picture of an underbelly of America that has been so infuriated by the current administration’s incompetence that it will support a grotesque man just because he points out the incompetence that we all abhor.
Why do I call Mr. Trump grotesque? Because he has stated: 1) Mexicans are rapists; 2) the Mexican government deports their criminals to America; 3) Jeb Bush has to like Mexicans because he married one; 4) Carli Fiorina is ugly; 5) Megan Kelly is bleeding out of who knows where; 6) other candidates have no right to be on the debate stage because their poll numbers are too low; 7) he Tweeted incorrect statistics on racial crimes; 8) he mocked a disabled journalist, AND 9) because he is a bigot that has called for all Muslims to be barred from entering the world’s most successful melting pot. This is behavior for which most of us would scold our children. It is not the behavior of a president.
Mr. Trump’s campaign is based on his being a “winner.” He will fix everything because he is a winner and to prove it he says “just look at my poll numbers.” His poll numbers are the highest among the Republican candidates because he more clearly than any other candidate identifies the incompetence of the Obama administration and because he is a celebrity that knows “if it bleeds, it leads.”
Sometimes plain talk can subtly covey deep meaning. Sometimes plain talk can be just the babbling of someone out of their league attempting to discuss complex issues. Mr. Trump’s plain talk falls into the category of the latter. Yes, he stirs emotions regarding the issues Americans care about; the threat of terrorism, the slowness of our economic recovery, the porousness of our borders, the rise of ISIS, and the lack of our government to do anything to fix these issue. But to each of these issues, Mr. Trump has stated that he will build a wall, hire great people, be a fantastic military leader and make America great again. Beyond causing some bleeding, Mr. Trump offers no solutions.
Mr. Trump is feeling the heat from the throngs of Republicans who, up to this point, were tolerating his crudeness. I even defended him in a previous article when I took John Harwood to task for asking another candidate during a debate if, when he looks at Mr. Trump “do you see someone with the moral character to be the leader of the free world?” At that point, the question was premature and out of line. Today I believe that the question is appropriate. And, my answer is NO! Mr. Trump does not have the moral character to be the leader of the free world.

And now he will become Mr. Scrooge. Eventually, he will get tired of the harassment that will not go away. He has earned this harassment and he will receive it. Then he will leave the Republican Party, run as an Independent and take 15% of the Republican voters with him. Good riddance. I would rather lose to Hillary Clinton than have Donald Trump represent the Republican Party. Although I am a registered independent myself, I have great respect for the Republican Party. It is the only defense our country has against the craziness of the leftist, progressive movement.

Tuesday, December 8, 2015

The People on Our Televisions

This is just something I wrote for fun. What follows are quick, drive-by glimpses of the people that keep popping up on our TV screens and what impressions they have left on me.
Hillary Clinton:              Do I have to campaign? Can I not just move into the White House now? BTW, I was the Secretary of State for four years and never sent a classified email. Well, none of them were marked as being classified.
President Obama:        I see nothing, I hear noting, I know noting. Please let these 13 months pass quickly. Yes, Hillary, you can have this job now.
Bernie Sanders:            Whoa baby, people are really listening to me! I think this income inequality thing is going to get me somewhere.
Marco Rubio:                Demographics is destiny – so why is Ted Cruz raining on my parade? BTW, I am the son of a bartender and a maid. I am the American dream.
Jeb Bush:                     So what if nobody will vote for me; I have the most money and I’m not really as wimpy as I look. And, BTW, I was the American dream.
Donald Trump:             If it bleeds it leads. And, that is how I poll. Come to think of it, I campaign that way too.
A Trump Supporter:      Duh, isn’t the Donald cool? He talks just like me do.
Jeffrey Lord:                 Can you believe that the media allow me to speak as though I am Donald Trump’s spokesperson? I can say anything I want and people think I am speaking on behalf of the Donald. It’s great for Donald. He can disown anything I say because I am really a nobody. You have to love this whole Donald gig. The media don’t know what ethics are - do they” (Think about it CNN.)
Ted Cruz:                      I’m Cuban-American too. And, I can get the Donald Trump voters. I hope those people really go out and vote. I am the smartest guy in the room. BTW, I will crush Hillary in a head-to-head debate.
Ben Carson:                 I am a brain surgeon and I went to Turkey once in my life. That’s a better resume then a community organizer. Yawn.
Chris Christie:               I was supposed to be the tough guy. When will Donald just go away? I actually fought terrorism and was a red governor in a blue state.
All Other Candidates:   How long should I stay in the race? Have I been in long enough for the nominee to pick me as the veep? Or secretary of state, defense secretary, treasury secretary, attorney general, surgeon general, or maybe the next apprentice? (Will you all just go away, please?)
Anthony Kennedy:        The country is evenly split and the legislators cannot make a new law if they all somehow, miraculously found agreement on something. It’s good to be the king. (Okay, Anthony Kennedy does not show up on our television screens. But the Supreme Court is discussed a lot.)
Vladimir Putin:              The West fears me, my people love me. It’s good to be the Czar. Obama has 13 months, I have as long as I want. Which country should I conquer next? I guess I should do a few more while Obama is still around. Maybe I can cause some world panic to get the price of oil back up again. Maybe I’ll have the Iranians shut down the Strait of Hormuz. I have to get something out of sending my military to Syria.


Okay, fun is over. Go back to work.

Sunday, December 6, 2015

The President, Terrorism, Radical Islamism, and a Dream (but it's just a dream)

It has been four days since the terrorist attack in San Bernardino and finally the President has scheduled time to address the nation. His address will be at 8PM EST tonight, Sunday, December 6, 2015. Out of pure frustration, I have dreamed up the address that I would like to hear. Here is my dream …………..
My fellow Americans, this past Wednesday our nation was brutally attacked by a couple of cowards that sought to gain glory by creating a sense of fear that our freedoms are no longer our inalienable right. They used the very freedoms they assailed to perpetrate their act of cowardness. I apologize for not speaking to you sooner. I should have made this address on Wednesday night.
Whereas many if not most Americans believed that this cowardly act was in fact terrorism right from the start, I thought it best to make sure of the facts first. I originally believed that it could just as easily have been an act of workplace violence as it could have been terrorism. I did not want to jump to conclusions and tar the reputation of the perpetrators when they very well may have just been disgruntled people. I jumped to conclusions in the past; as in the Cambridge Massachusetts case where I incorrectly stated that the police had acted stupidly; and in the Trayvon Martin case where I stated that if I had a son that he would look like Trayvon. I should not have prejudiced those cases before the facts were known and I did not want to do that again.
I have contemplated my delay in this particular case and have concluded that this was a case where my quick response was necessary and that I failed in this regard. Fourteen Americans were killed and another twenty-one were wounded. I should not have worried about the reputation of the perpetrators. Even if they were just disgruntled people, they were cold blooded murderers. To be honest, I was also afraid of tarnishing the Muslim faith but I will discuss that in a few minutes. The nation deserved to have a President similar to the French President who took quick, decisive actions to assure the French people that its government was responding with every possible resource to determine the extent of the ongoing threat and to mitigate that threat. Once I realized my failing in this regard, I contemplated other things that I am going to change in order to regain you confidence.
First I am not going to be passive aggressive towards the men and women that protect us every day, the police of our great nation. I have been silent for far too long on this and have allowed some in our society to criticize and even demonize these protectors of law and order. I do believe that people of color have suffered past injustices in our society but I also believe that our society has taken extraordinary steps to address these injustices. Today, a person of color has all the opportunities that our great nation makes available to all its citizens. We as people of color need to take advantage of the opportunities that have been made available to us. We must not point the finger of blame at anyone else if we fail to do so. Black lives do matter but that is because all lives matter; black, white, yellow, brown and blue. There are some bad policemen and we must be vigilant to identify them and remove them from their positions of authority. If necessary, we will bring them to justice. But we must stop demonizing all policemen. At this time of crisis and increased terrorism, we need our police. The very police that are now needed the most have been demoralized because of my lack of support. I hope that this statement reinforces to every man and women in blue that they have my full support and backing and they have the full support and backing of all law abiding Americans. At this time, we need you. We need you to be proactive without worrying about being second guessed.
To people of color, I am not abandoning you. I realize that there are still pockets of racism in our society. There always will be. We must deal with it while recognizing the progress we have made and the opportunities we have gained. With these opportunities, we must now achieve. The achievement of one person of color will aspire ten more. We must pursue this path of individual achievement that will grow into a community of achievement. That is how we will eliminate the inequities that some now see. In the meantime, thank your local police for keeping you safe.
Next, I have to address my obsession with the Muslim faith. I have previously related my wonderful childhood memories of the beautiful call to prayers that I experienced as a little boy in Indonesia. I have gone out of my way to be the champion of the minority and that has included people of the Muslim faith. I will continue to be such a champion, but I now realize that my engineering of the English language is not helping. Many Americans refer to the terrorist threat we are facing as radical Islamist terrorism. I have fought any such identification as I feared that it would incorrectly portray all Muslims as terrorists. Upon self-reflection, I realize that this is wrong. Every group of our society has bad elements. We all realize that one bad Christian does not equate to all Christians being bad people. Likewise we must realize that a group of bad Muslims does not equate to all Muslims being bad people. The San Bernardino female terrorist pledged her allegiance to the Islamic State.  The Islamic State is using a perverted form of the Islamic faith to recruit terrorists. If our enemy calls themselves Muslims, we must also call them Muslims – radical Muslims. To this end, from this point forward I will address the war we are now facing as a war against radical Islamism. I will also direct my entire administration to do the same. We must identify the enemy we are facing it we are to defeat it.
To people of the great Muslim faith. I am not abandoning you. I wish to eradicate the horrific violence that people perpetrate while fraudulently invoking the name of your great faith. Furthermore, I need you to stand with me and all Americans and denounce the radical Islamists as fraudulent postulators of your faith. All Americans must stand with the good people of the Muslim faith as fellow American citizens. As this is a global war, we must also stand with the good Muslims of Syria, Iraq, Libya and wherever else radical Islamists threaten and harm our fellow citizens of the world.
Finally I now realize that my delay in addressing this festering radical Islamist movement has, and will continue to cost American civilian lives. It was my hope that engaging the radical Islamist world with an olive branch rather than with a riffle would stop the radical Islamist attacks against freedom. The attacks in just the past few weeks, Paris, Turkey, San Bernardino, have proven me wrong. We are now under a full-out assault from these radical Islamist terrorists and I must inform all Americans that these attacks will become more frequent and more violent until we remove the scourge from which this terrorism stems – radical Islamism.
The San Bernardino attack is the threat we will face in the homeland. A lone wolf or a handful of lone wolves that live in despair and are somehow touched by the call to radical Islamism. These individuals must seem insignificant to themselves and they must believe that their affiliation with radical Islamism gives them eternal meaning and rewards. I have allowed the image of radical Islamism grow to the point that these lost individuals believe they are teaming up with a cause and even a state that will eventually rule the entire globe. They believe that their act of terrorism will contribute to this end goal of world domination by radical Islamism. My delay in eradicating radical Islamism from the world has allowed this aura of radical Islamism dominance to rise and to persist for far too long. Along with the rise of the Islamic State has been the rise of lone wolves around the world that are now ready to strike us.
We must eradicate radial Islamism by destroying ISIS on the battlefield, take their territory, eliminate their sources of funding, and kill them. We must show the world that goodness will prevail over evil. This will eventually stop the radicalization of lone wolves. However, in the short term, the large number of lone wolves that already exist will lash back at us. We will not only be fighting radical Islamism in Syria, we will be fighting them here at home too.
To protect Americans, I am ordering a full out military campaign to eradicate the Islamic State. I will be coordinating our military actions with our Arab and NATO allies. I am declaring a state of emergency in the homeland just as President Hollande did in France. This will allow law enforcement to more thoroughly and quickly hunt down lone wolves. I am directing the joint chiefs to develop plans for military raids into Libya, West Africa and all other hot spots of radical Islamism. America will cause the radical Islamists to run like rats and to be squashed like roaches. We will create a world where there will be nothing aspirational about radical Islamism.
My fellow Americans, you too must participate in the war against radical Islamism. If you see something say something. We cannot allow political correctness to prevent us from using our common sense that can prevent terrorists’ attacks. Unfortunately, my poor example of over-done political correctness resulted in citizens being afraid of saying something prior to the San Bernardino attack because they were afraid of being stigmatized as anti-Muslim. We are in the battle for our existence, forget about political correctness. 
Americans that are licensed and qualified to use firearms should be prepared to use them. If you are at the scene of a terrorist attack, you can respond immediately. The police will come, but never in time.
Together with our Arab and NATO allies, we will defeat radical Islamism both in their homeland and here in our homeland. We will make the world a safe place again.
Thank you and God bless America.
__________________________________________________________

Okay, it’s just a dream but I bet you’re dreaming it too. The nightmare is that the President has another thirteen months left in office. Imagine how much worse things can get in thirteen months. If the President does not recognize radical Islamism as the existential threat that it is – he should recuse himself as President. The existential threat is actually the President’s blind spot with regard to radical Islamism. With leadership we can defeat radical Islamism. Can we wait thirteen months for leadership?

Friday, December 4, 2015

Why Calling San Bernardino Terrorism is Important

Because America is frightened and we need to see decisiveness and action. Instead of action, we have the Confuser-in-Chief making a public statement that “it might be terrorism but it may also be workforce violence.” What Americans are hearing is: "this is no big deal unless we find out some more, so don’t worry about it." But we are not only worried, we are terrified.
Nobody wants to preclude the perpetrators their civil rights of finding out the truth. Maybe they will be cleared of any terrorism related activities. But they will still be cold blooded murderers. The point right now is not their involvement with terrorism, it is that terrorists are among us. The news media have stated that the perpetrators had been radicalized and that they had contact with known international terrorists. Ninety-nine point nine percent of Americans believe that this was a terrorist attack.
Political correctness can and will result in American deaths.
Rather than NOT calling this terrorism until we have fully investigated the circumstances (for who knows how long) – we need to say this is almost certainly an act of terrorism and we are acting as though it was inspired and/or directed by either ISIS or al Qaeda. As a result, we are raising the terror threat and taking all possible actions to protect the American people.
Americans need to know that their government is chasing down every possible terrorist that could be affiliated with this attack. We need to know if there are other planned attacks – or at least that our government is attempting to find out. We need to know that the NSA has traced back everyone these murderers have contacted in the last two years. We need to know that our government is taking this seriously. Confusion is not making anyone (other than the President) feel any better about this situation.
The FBI spokesperson consistently stating that we will follow the investigation where ever it leads us is not comforting. I don’t want us to be following the terrorists. I want to be out front hunting them down before they hunt us down.
Please Mr. President, be a leader and get out in front of this. Protecting the image of American Muslims is not the immediate need right now. The immediate need is the protection of American lives.
__________________________________________________________

Note: Approximately one hour after the above article was posted, the FBI made a statement noting that the investigating is now being conducted under the assumption of an act of terrorism.  However, the President of the United States, almost twenty-four hours after the FBI's announcement has yet to address the nation. We have been attacked Mr. President, where are you?