Principle. That is it, plain old principle.
The type of principle that lays out the objectives, some practical
policies that could achieve the stated objectives and the expressed willingness
to debate matters with both sides of the aisle in order to pass laws aimed at
achieving the objectives.
Here are sample objectives: control immigration into America, repatriating
the trillions of dollars American corporations have overseas, eradicating ISIS,
identifying terrorists before they strike us here at home, creating more middle
class jobs, assuring equal opportunities to all Americans, improving our
healthcare system, assuring a habitable environment, assuring that justice is
truly blind.
Other example objectives that are not as high on my priority are:
eliminating income inequality, reducing greenhouse gasses, affirmative action,
political correctness. These are low on my priority because they are
sub-objectives of some of the objectives laid out in the paragraph above.
I want a candidate to say that my objective is to get American
corporations to bring back the trillions of dollars they currently have stashed
overseas because they do not want to pay taxes on that money. My plan to do
this, and to prevent large American corporations from relocating their corporate
headquarters overseas, is to change our tax policy to be more in-line with the
rest of the developed world. Why would companies bring their money back here if
we tax them more than any other country in the world? To make up for the lost
revenue resulting from the lower tax rate, I propose that the following
corporate tax exemptions be eliminated (enter appropriate items here). I do not
expect that the elimination of these exemptions will fully offset the lost
revenue from reduced tax rates. However, the status quo will result in no tax
revenue as the money will stay overseas. Furthermore, these trillions of
dollars when brought back to America can be used by corporations to distribute
as dividends to its shareholders and/or to invest in research and development
and/or infrastructure investments that the company needs to further grow its
business. I plan to layout the outline of
my plan for discussions with the leaders of both parties so that we can
together build upon my ideas and most likely come up with a better plan. But,
the underlying principle is to repatriate the money to America so it can be
used to help stimulate our economy.
I would also like to hear a candidate say that my objective is to
control immigration into America. This means controlling our borders once and
for all, establishing controls on those who enter our nation on valid visas but
never leave, and it means vetting all immigrants and visitors before they reach
our soil. This will require an expenditure of $X billion and I propose that we
pay for this by charging visa fees, immigration fees, and other methods
(hopefully, the candidate has more ideas than I do). We will not build a wall
across the Mexican border but we will construct a double fence with sensors to
detect possible invaders and sufficient border patrol personnel to be able to
intercept these invaders. I plan to
layout the outline of my plan for discussions with the leaders of both parties
so that we can together build upon my ideas and most likely come up with a
better plan. But, the underlying principle is to keep America safe by
stopping the flow of illegal immigration, and assuring that those we allow to
enter America do not intend to harm us.
I really want to hear: I am going to eradicate ISIS and any other
terrorists group that controls territory and/or assets that can be used to
plan, direct or conduct strikes against American interests’ particular strikes
against the homeland and our citizens. I
plan to do this with special operations forces and our Arab and NATO partners. We
and our NATO partners will provide several thousand special operation forces
and air support for the mission. Our Arab allies will provide infantry ground
forces to establish control of the territory seized. ISIS is reported to have
upwards of 40,000 soldiers and they control several hundred square miles of territory.
That means that those 40,000 soldiers are spread out over a large swath of land
including several towns. We will attack one town at a time and do it slowly. By
progressing slowly, we will allow ISIS reinforcements from other towns to
attempt to join the fight. And when they travel across open roads to get to
where we are fighting, we will hit them with air strikes. We will conduct this
operation one town at a time and when we move on from one town to the next, we
will leave our Arab allies to establish a temporary military led government until
the local country can govern themselves. Any assets we seize from ISIS during
this operation such as oil fields will be used to generate revenue to pay for a
portion of our continuing eradication of ISIS. I will have our generals work
with our allies to develop such plans and I will hold discussions with the leaders of both parties so that we can together
build upon my ideas and most likely come up with a better plan. But, the
underlying principle is to eradicate ISIS.
The above three examples are what I want to see in our political
discourse. Principles of what we should achieve. Discussions of both the
principles and policies to achieve these principles and a stated willingness to
compromise. I can accept some red lines on the objectives, but I cannot accept
a politician that will not compromise on the how-to-get-there details.
I do not want pages and pages of policy wonk. I want some good
ideas to gauge the candidates understanding of the issues but I do not want a
fully developed pan on a specific objective. I want political discourse from
both sides of America to participate so that everybody can buy-in to the plan.
This is the America I remember when I was a much younger man. It
is the America I want back.
No comments:
Post a Comment